Mi school was called “The Greenland School”. This school was mixed and their orientation was secular. In this school was very important sport so they offered classes in soccer, cheerleader, basketball, rugby, tennis, swimming and volleyball. But also in this school were important subjects of mathematics, language, history, English, physics, chemistry and biology. Each of these subjects was important and necessary for our training, but the music and arts subjects were not very important. In addition to these subjects and sports, the college offered workshops like chess, laboratory, confectionary, literature, theatre, choir and dance. These workshops were held at approximately the school day and were very interesting and entertaining. The relationship with teachers was very good; they were not authoritarian in their classrooms. Additionally, each teacher developed a course and could not perform other than their specialty. I have very fond memories of the language teacher Miss Karen, biology professor Carlos Zapata and history teacher Miss Roxana. They were very good teachers and was much beloved by students. The technology in my school was good. There datashow, multimedia room with TV, well equipped science laboratory and with many materials, computer room. And all these rooms were available to students every time we needed it. I think the level of education I received was good but could have been better, because the school had teachers and resources to deliver a better education. I also think this school was very new we were the fourth generation of graduates. But the school I give very good tools, as well as the values of respect and solidarity.
I would tell the authorities began to worry about education and not to remain only in words. As a first idea is to regulate the training of teachers, because now anyone can be a teacher, another idea is to run programs in the poorest schools to motivate students, as various educational workshops.
I believe that each person is responsible for his education, but also important is the quality of education they receive. For example if a child is motivated to study, but the education they receive is poor, he is no longer responsible. I believe that education is built, some students surrender, another teacher and another family.First time I hear this saying, but I think it means that without students there are no teachers, or when a student is good is because his teacher is too. But I believe that this is bizarre.
I would tell the authorities began to worry about education and not to remain only in words. As a first idea is to regulate the training of teachers, because now anyone can be a teacher, another idea is to run programs in the poorest schools to motivate students, as various educational workshops.
I believe that each person is responsible for his education, but also important is the quality of education they receive. For example if a child is motivated to study, but the education they receive is poor, he is no longer responsible. I believe that education is built, some students surrender, another teacher and another family.First time I hear this saying, but I think it means that without students there are no teachers, or when a student is good is because his teacher is too. But I believe that this is bizarre.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario